<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working With Client ID In ASP.NET 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/</link>
	<description>Everything .Net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abdul Sami</title>
		<link>http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/comment-page-1/#comment-15138</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul Sami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/#comment-15138</guid>
		<description>Here is an article on some of  new features of asp.net 4.0. See if it can help you on asp.net 4.0

http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/Whatis_New_ASP_Net_4.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an article on some of  new features of asp.net 4.0. See if it can help you on asp.net 4.0</p>
<p><a href="http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/Whatis_New_ASP_Net_4.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/Whatis_New_ASP_Net_4.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armond</title>
		<link>http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/comment-page-1/#comment-12966</link>
		<dc:creator>armond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/#comment-12966</guid>
		<description>I wish I had come across the site sooner. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I had come across the site sooner. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/comment-page-1/#comment-12788</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/#comment-12788</guid>
		<description>Markive,

I agree with you. This is not a proper fix but a step towards getting it right. Given what we have dealt with in past this could be better than nothing. 

In future I see more public facing sites abandoning Web Forms and adapting frameworks such as ASP.NET MVC which produce clean markup. 

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Markive,</p>
<p>I agree with you. This is not a proper fix but a step towards getting it right. Given what we have dealt with in past this could be better than nothing. </p>
<p>In future I see more public facing sites abandoning Web Forms and adapting frameworks such as ASP.NET MVC which produce clean markup. </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/comment-page-1/#comment-12786</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/#comment-12786</guid>
		<description>Hi Aron,

Thanks for you comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aron,</p>
<p>Thanks for you comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/comment-page-1/#comment-12785</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/#comment-12785</guid>
		<description>Sarel,

Accessing elements generated by Web Forms on client has always been painful. And this new edition is a step towards easing that pain. Thanks for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarel,</p>
<p>Accessing elements generated by Web Forms on client has always been painful. And this new edition is a step towards easing that pain. Thanks for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/comment-page-1/#comment-12784</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/#comment-12784</guid>
		<description>Hi Harry,

In the examples above I am showing partial markup. I guess this is the best we can get in ASP.NET 4. Of course there is plenty of room for improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Harry,</p>
<p>In the examples above I am showing partial markup. I guess this is the best we can get in ASP.NET 4. Of course there is plenty of room for improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markive</title>
		<link>http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/comment-page-1/#comment-12761</link>
		<dc:creator>Markive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/#comment-12761</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t .Net parse the page for the ID as you set it and KEEP IT AS THAT!! It&#039;s my fault if the page has two elements with the same ID.. The whole  is a total mess and really lets .net down on the client side.. I don&#039;t see this as a fix but a halfway measure..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t .Net parse the page for the ID as you set it and KEEP IT AS THAT!! It&#8217;s my fault if the page has two elements with the same ID.. The whole  is a total mess and really lets .net down on the client side.. I don&#8217;t see this as a fix but a halfway measure..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/comment-page-1/#comment-12759</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/#comment-12759</guid>
		<description>Short and sweet, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short and sweet, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarel Smit</title>
		<link>http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/comment-page-1/#comment-12756</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarel Smit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/#comment-12756</guid>
		<description>Cool!! Now we can access elements again via javascript and jQuery, that ID specified by the compiler for nested controls was just nasty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!! Now we can access elements again via javascript and jQuery, that ID specified by the compiler for nested controls was just nasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtpHarry</title>
		<link>http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/comment-page-1/#comment-12743</link>
		<dc:creator>rtpHarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedotnetway.com/working-with-client-id-in-asp-net-4/#comment-12743</guid>
		<description>But looking at these examples they all create either invalid markup or are just as long and polluted as their originals. Isn&#039;t there a way to use this new feature in a clean way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But looking at these examples they all create either invalid markup or are just as long and polluted as their originals. Isn&#8217;t there a way to use this new feature in a clean way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

